skip to main |
skip to sidebar
A acrylic crystals is forever?
Diamonds are neither rare nor valuable. In fact, diamonds are very common mineral on Earth, in Europe and America, it has a good cut diamonds outnumber cars. Although they are very expensive, but it is difficult to like merchandise free trade, because of second-hand diamond prices much lower than the original price. Natural beauty of diamonds has also been reflected light can be replaced with crystals beads. If you do not have that traditional acrylic crystals romantic image, it may not worth it.
Artificially drive up the formation of expensive
Expensive expensive acrylic crystals in South Africa is a company De Beers, the successful use of the results from the marketing. De
Beers dominated the rhinestones crystals supply 80 percent of the world (Editor's
note: This is the 1980s, in 2006 still accounted for an estimated 60%
Source Wikipedia), under stringent production Control, De Beers
succeeded in maintaining rhinestones crystals the artificially high prices. By
shaping a diamond eternal romantic image, greatly reducing the holders
to sell diamonds in diamonds, even the Great Depression, people will
still try to retain rather than sell the crystals beads, because it may have
special holders significance.
Supply exceeds demand
The
world's supply of diamonds have been more than it needs, logically
speaking, should decline in value of the acrylic crystals become very cheap
fishes. However,
De Beers continued to buy on the market through extra diamond to
maintain its high prices, it is estimated that at present only, De Beers
has already amassed more than ten billion dollars worth of crystals beads. De Beers also support the long, sustained buying diamonds on the market, no one can answer.
The exploitation of cheap labor
Most
of the world's diamonds, Africa or Russia are poor miners mined
diamonds, diamond three-quarters of workers by extreme poverty in India
complete the cut, most or child labor, labor is every cut a stone four dollars.
The United States because De Beers unethical exploitation of
labor, and prohibit the company set up shop selling diamonds in the
United States, but, ironically, through other brokers to sell, the
United States remains the largest De Beers diamond market.
Successful advertising and marketing
De Beers success in the world loose crystals, can be said to be a perfect example of a near-total exclusive. De
Beers always stimulate demand for diamonds, on the other hand to reduce
the supply of rhinestones crystals, even after the invention of artificial diamonds
singular GE, De Beers was able to successfully maintain the image of
the perfect high-priced diamonds. In fact, De Beers spends more than 160 million dollars in
advertising costs to deliver the "Diamonds are Forever A diamond is
forever," the message continued rhinestones crystals romantic legend.This
South African company in 1888 founded De Beers took a century to
persuade the Americans to accept Europe with a diamond ring as a wedding
ring tradition. 1950, the same miracle has played in Japan, De Beers will transfer
successful Western wedding culture to Japan and Asia, Japan has since
become the world's second largest diamond consumer market.Colored birds did not like this luxury, but I never knew the diamond behind such stories. The original crystals beads is a very common mineral, is just one company an
exclusive and drive up prices, and the way is the use of labor
exploitation and mining diamonds.When I read this, I was really surprised! Also
felt the power of advertising media influence people's thinking, you
can imagine this huge money De Beers company, consumer markets in
various countries and influence the media advertising industry, so those
of us little people did not hear the real story of these diamonds He accepted the De Beers wanted to instill in everyone's ideas.In
the next film, advertising, seen on the star shining crystals beads, I do not
think this is the romantic image of celebrities, but think of the poor
living in African diamond miners hunger, ignorance and poor public
spending big money.
No comments:
Post a Comment